Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Impact of Culture in Contemporary Organization

People from different countries as well as regions inside them often do things in different ways. One way to explain variations in behavior is the idea of culture. There are so many definitions of culture because the concept is complex. According to Hofstede (1997), culture is the software of the mind, similar to a computer program that controls behavior. According to Sathe (1985), culture is a series of important values and beliefs that are characteristic for the members of a particular society and are relevant to their view of the world as well as to the ideals worth to strive for. however the culture can’t readily be expressed directly. The impact of culture in an organization can be look at in several aspects.

1, the impact of culture on motivation

The culture of a country or region in which the organizations function influences the way of motivating employees a great deal. In collective countries, such as Japan, giving an individual reward to an employee could embarrass the recipient and thus be de-motivating. Offering rewards for individual behavior that runs counter to group norms is unlikely to have a positive influence on motivation. People prefer to receive money, titles, or other materialistic or status-oriented rewards. (Hofstede, 1997).  

2, the impact of culture on communication

People in different cultures communicate among themselves differently. There are major differences in language usage, verbal style, and nonverbal communication. Verbal communication styles are vary in different cultures and their communication patterns. Also culture has quite a strong impact on nonverbal communication which may be expressed through facial expressions, gestures, eye contact and posture. Greeting gestures has significant identifications. For an example, in a business situation, North Americans shake hands, Japanese bow, and Middle Easterners of the same sex kiss on the cheek (Abbasi and Holman, 1993).

3, the impact of culture on conflict resolution

The way people sense conflicts varies widely with culture. Intercultural communications expert Stella Ting-Toomey has developed a theory of culture and conflict that explains cultural differences using Hall's low and high context framework (Gundykunst and Ting-Toomey, 1988). According to this theory, people in low-context cultures see conflict as instrumentally oriented. Conflict often arises because one party violates the other's expectations. People are oriented toward action. This results in a direct, confrontational response to conflict, with all parties wanting a quick resolution. In the high-context culture, which has more specific rules of behavior, conflict usually occurs when a person violates cultural expectations. This often results in avoiding or ignoring the conflict.


References

1. Abbasi, S. M. and Hollman, K. W. (1993) ‘Business Success in the Middle East, Management Decision’, 31(1), pp. 55-59.
2. Gunykunst, W. B. and Ting-Toomey, S. (1988) Culture and Interpersonal Communication. California: Sage.        
3. Hofstede, G. (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

4. Sathe, V. (1985) Culture and Related Corporate Realities. New York: Irwin. 

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Technological Changes in HR the Global Perspective

Rapid changes in technology have affected businesses in more ways, from globalization and organizational adjustments to a workforce looking for remote and mobile job opportunities and human resources has had to adapt swiftly. If HR wants to continue to play a critical role in helping businesses anticipate and manage organizational change, HR must have technology at its core. (Biro, 2016)
Mobile Technology

Cloud security makes it easy to limit access to information. At the same time, cloud-based mobile platforms allow individuals to access their information more readily than ever before. In MAS Holdings employees uses Office 365 cloud. Currently need to visit or email HR every time you had a question about your benefits or paycheck; instead, if it is able to log on to a portal where all that information was at your fingertips. It could be use the same portal to request Leave, Time off, or Attendance corrections etc. Mobile HR apps make it easy for employees to access this kind of information anywhere and anytime. The global organizations like Apple, Google are introducing Wearable Technology which can be allow employees to stay connected anytime.  And that makes life easier for HR workers, too. (Biro, 2016)
Adopted by; webster.edu
Wearable devices - adopted by; post.jagren.com



Social Media

But social networking has more than a conceptual role in HR today, almost a quarter of employers are regularly using sites such as Facebook and LinkedIn to recruit staff. HR industry have to adopted the concept of social networking it has broadened their perspective that technology doesn’t always have to be purchased to have an impact.(Christie, 2016)

Talent Management Systems (TMS)
Talent management system is an integrated software suite that addresses the recruitment; performance management; learning and development; and compensation management. In MAS Holdings they practicing the Talent2O talent management system
Adopted by; salesforce.com

Here some examples for globally recognized talent management systems.
BambooHR 
Adopted by; recruiter,com
Oracle
Adopted by; famouslogos.com

iCIMS Talent Platform
Adopted by; njbmagazine.com


Advantages of Technological Changes in HR

 

For Organization

·         Employees will become the decision makers
·         Eliminate wastes like waiting, unnecessary movements, and save time and cost
·         Can identify the gaps and bridge the gaps
·         Talent management process becomes better
·         Talent practices will play a key role

For HR

·         HR department takes more strategic role
·         Almost every aspect of the HR will be streamlined
·         Collaboration and new organization structure will be evolved
·         HR can analyze employee data, and create customized talent offerings    


References

Biro, M. M. (2016). The Impact of Technology on HR and What’s Ahead. Retrieved from www.huffingtonpost.com: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/meghan-m-biro-/the-impact-of-technology-_1_b_9294208.html

Christie, J. (2016). HR in the future: The impact of technology. Retrieved from www.hrzone.com: https://www.hrzone.com/talent/development/hr-in-the-future-the-impact-of-technology


Tuesday, December 5, 2017

Contemporary Performance Management Practices

Performance management is the foundation for employee performance and engagement. It is a developmental tool used for all round development of the employee and the organization.  The process includes setting clear and specific expectations, and providing specific and ongoing feedback both informal and formal.
By some estimates, more than one-third of U.S. companies are doing just the traditional appraisal process. Early adopters in the industries like Gap, Lear, Oppenheimer Funds and even General Electric, the longtime role model for traditional appraisals. As you might expect, technology companies such as Adobe, Juniper Systems, Dell, Microsoft, and IBM have led the way. They are using modern technics and systems to do the performance appraisals. (Capelli & Tavis, 2016)


Performance Appraisal Process

Author Drawn
Trending Performance Appraisal Methods

1, Management by Objectives

It means management by objectives and the performance is rated against the achievement of objectives stated by the management. In MAS Holdings it is using a system named Talent2O for appraisals of the Executive and above categories. Talent2o process goes as under below main categories.

·         Establish goals and desired outcomes for each subordinate
·         Setting performance standards
·         Comparison of actual goals with goals attained by the employee
·         Establish new goals and new strategies for goals not achieved in previous year.
(Kane, 2017)

2, 360-Degree Feedback
           
            It is a technique which is systematic collection of performance data on an individual group, derived from a number of stakeholders like immediate supervisors, team members, customers, peers and self. 360-degree appraisals are useful to measure inter-personal skills, customer satisfaction and team building skills. In Nestle uses 360 degree method for their appraisals. (Anon., 2016)

3, Psychological Appraisals

            These appraisals are more directed to assess employee’s potential for future performance. It is done in the form of in-depth interviews, psychological tests, and discussion with supervisors and review of other evaluations.


Difference between Traditional and Modern Appraisals methods

Categories
Traditional Appraisals
Modern, Systems Appraisals
Guiding Values
Individualistic, Control oriented, Documentary
Systematic, Developmental, Problem solving
Leadership Styles
Directional, Evaluative
Facilitative, Coaching
Frequency
Occasional
Frequent
Formalities
High
Low
Rewards
Individualistic
Grouped, Organizational
(Kane, 2017)

References

1,Anon., (2016). Performance appraisal system of nestle. [Online]
Available at: https://www.coursehero.com/file/17697240/Performance-appraisal-system-of-nestle/
[Accessed 06 Dec 2017 at 11.13pm].

2,Capelli, P. & Tavis, A., (2016). The Performance Management Revolution. [Online]
Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolution
[Accessed 06 Dec 2017 at 11.36 pm].

3,Kane, P., (2017). Performance Appraisal Methods. [Online]
Available at: https://corehr.wordpress.com/performance-management/performance-appraisal-methods/
[Accessed 06 Dec 2017 at 10.38 pm].