Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Impact of Culture in Contemporary Organization

People from different countries as well as regions inside them often do things in different ways. One way to explain variations in behavior is the idea of culture. There are so many definitions of culture because the concept is complex. According to Hofstede (1997), culture is the software of the mind, similar to a computer program that controls behavior. According to Sathe (1985), culture is a series of important values and beliefs that are characteristic for the members of a particular society and are relevant to their view of the world as well as to the ideals worth to strive for. however the culture can’t readily be expressed directly. The impact of culture in an organization can be look at in several aspects.

1, the impact of culture on motivation

The culture of a country or region in which the organizations function influences the way of motivating employees a great deal. In collective countries, such as Japan, giving an individual reward to an employee could embarrass the recipient and thus be de-motivating. Offering rewards for individual behavior that runs counter to group norms is unlikely to have a positive influence on motivation. People prefer to receive money, titles, or other materialistic or status-oriented rewards. (Hofstede, 1997).  

2, the impact of culture on communication

People in different cultures communicate among themselves differently. There are major differences in language usage, verbal style, and nonverbal communication. Verbal communication styles are vary in different cultures and their communication patterns. Also culture has quite a strong impact on nonverbal communication which may be expressed through facial expressions, gestures, eye contact and posture. Greeting gestures has significant identifications. For an example, in a business situation, North Americans shake hands, Japanese bow, and Middle Easterners of the same sex kiss on the cheek (Abbasi and Holman, 1993).

3, the impact of culture on conflict resolution

The way people sense conflicts varies widely with culture. Intercultural communications expert Stella Ting-Toomey has developed a theory of culture and conflict that explains cultural differences using Hall's low and high context framework (Gundykunst and Ting-Toomey, 1988). According to this theory, people in low-context cultures see conflict as instrumentally oriented. Conflict often arises because one party violates the other's expectations. People are oriented toward action. This results in a direct, confrontational response to conflict, with all parties wanting a quick resolution. In the high-context culture, which has more specific rules of behavior, conflict usually occurs when a person violates cultural expectations. This often results in avoiding or ignoring the conflict.


References

1. Abbasi, S. M. and Hollman, K. W. (1993) ‘Business Success in the Middle East, Management Decision’, 31(1), pp. 55-59.
2. Gunykunst, W. B. and Ting-Toomey, S. (1988) Culture and Interpersonal Communication. California: Sage.        
3. Hofstede, G. (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

4. Sathe, V. (1985) Culture and Related Corporate Realities. New York: Irwin. 

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Technological Changes in HR the Global Perspective

Rapid changes in technology have affected businesses in more ways, from globalization and organizational adjustments to a workforce looking for remote and mobile job opportunities and human resources has had to adapt swiftly. If HR wants to continue to play a critical role in helping businesses anticipate and manage organizational change, HR must have technology at its core. (Biro, 2016)
Mobile Technology

Cloud security makes it easy to limit access to information. At the same time, cloud-based mobile platforms allow individuals to access their information more readily than ever before. In MAS Holdings employees uses Office 365 cloud. Currently need to visit or email HR every time you had a question about your benefits or paycheck; instead, if it is able to log on to a portal where all that information was at your fingertips. It could be use the same portal to request Leave, Time off, or Attendance corrections etc. Mobile HR apps make it easy for employees to access this kind of information anywhere and anytime. The global organizations like Apple, Google are introducing Wearable Technology which can be allow employees to stay connected anytime.  And that makes life easier for HR workers, too. (Biro, 2016)
Adopted by; webster.edu
Wearable devices - adopted by; post.jagren.com



Social Media

But social networking has more than a conceptual role in HR today, almost a quarter of employers are regularly using sites such as Facebook and LinkedIn to recruit staff. HR industry have to adopted the concept of social networking it has broadened their perspective that technology doesn’t always have to be purchased to have an impact.(Christie, 2016)

Talent Management Systems (TMS)
Talent management system is an integrated software suite that addresses the recruitment; performance management; learning and development; and compensation management. In MAS Holdings they practicing the Talent2O talent management system
Adopted by; salesforce.com

Here some examples for globally recognized talent management systems.
BambooHR 
Adopted by; recruiter,com
Oracle
Adopted by; famouslogos.com

iCIMS Talent Platform
Adopted by; njbmagazine.com


Advantages of Technological Changes in HR

 

For Organization

·         Employees will become the decision makers
·         Eliminate wastes like waiting, unnecessary movements, and save time and cost
·         Can identify the gaps and bridge the gaps
·         Talent management process becomes better
·         Talent practices will play a key role

For HR

·         HR department takes more strategic role
·         Almost every aspect of the HR will be streamlined
·         Collaboration and new organization structure will be evolved
·         HR can analyze employee data, and create customized talent offerings    


References

Biro, M. M. (2016). The Impact of Technology on HR and What’s Ahead. Retrieved from www.huffingtonpost.com: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/meghan-m-biro-/the-impact-of-technology-_1_b_9294208.html

Christie, J. (2016). HR in the future: The impact of technology. Retrieved from www.hrzone.com: https://www.hrzone.com/talent/development/hr-in-the-future-the-impact-of-technology


Tuesday, December 5, 2017

Contemporary Performance Management Practices

Performance management is the foundation for employee performance and engagement. It is a developmental tool used for all round development of the employee and the organization.  The process includes setting clear and specific expectations, and providing specific and ongoing feedback both informal and formal.
By some estimates, more than one-third of U.S. companies are doing just the traditional appraisal process. Early adopters in the industries like Gap, Lear, Oppenheimer Funds and even General Electric, the longtime role model for traditional appraisals. As you might expect, technology companies such as Adobe, Juniper Systems, Dell, Microsoft, and IBM have led the way. They are using modern technics and systems to do the performance appraisals. (Capelli & Tavis, 2016)


Performance Appraisal Process

Author Drawn
Trending Performance Appraisal Methods

1, Management by Objectives

It means management by objectives and the performance is rated against the achievement of objectives stated by the management. In MAS Holdings it is using a system named Talent2O for appraisals of the Executive and above categories. Talent2o process goes as under below main categories.

·         Establish goals and desired outcomes for each subordinate
·         Setting performance standards
·         Comparison of actual goals with goals attained by the employee
·         Establish new goals and new strategies for goals not achieved in previous year.
(Kane, 2017)

2, 360-Degree Feedback
           
            It is a technique which is systematic collection of performance data on an individual group, derived from a number of stakeholders like immediate supervisors, team members, customers, peers and self. 360-degree appraisals are useful to measure inter-personal skills, customer satisfaction and team building skills. In Nestle uses 360 degree method for their appraisals. (Anon., 2016)

3, Psychological Appraisals

            These appraisals are more directed to assess employee’s potential for future performance. It is done in the form of in-depth interviews, psychological tests, and discussion with supervisors and review of other evaluations.


Difference between Traditional and Modern Appraisals methods

Categories
Traditional Appraisals
Modern, Systems Appraisals
Guiding Values
Individualistic, Control oriented, Documentary
Systematic, Developmental, Problem solving
Leadership Styles
Directional, Evaluative
Facilitative, Coaching
Frequency
Occasional
Frequent
Formalities
High
Low
Rewards
Individualistic
Grouped, Organizational
(Kane, 2017)

References

1,Anon., (2016). Performance appraisal system of nestle. [Online]
Available at: https://www.coursehero.com/file/17697240/Performance-appraisal-system-of-nestle/
[Accessed 06 Dec 2017 at 11.13pm].

2,Capelli, P. & Tavis, A., (2016). The Performance Management Revolution. [Online]
Available at: https://hbr.org/2016/10/the-performance-management-revolution
[Accessed 06 Dec 2017 at 11.36 pm].

3,Kane, P., (2017). Performance Appraisal Methods. [Online]
Available at: https://corehr.wordpress.com/performance-management/performance-appraisal-methods/
[Accessed 06 Dec 2017 at 10.38 pm].



Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Connections breaks Maslow’s theory

Abraham Harold Maslow (April 1, 1908 – June 8, 1970) was an American psychologist who was best known for creating Maslow's hierarchy of needs, a motivational theory in psychology comprising a five tier models of human needs. Maslow wrote many books in psychology like ‘Hierarchy of needs: a theory of human motivation’, ‘Motivation and Personality’, ‘Toward a psychology of being’, etc.

A.H.Maslow; Adopted by thefamouspeople.com
According to Maslow there are five major need categories that apply to people in general, starting from the basic fundamental needs and leading through a hierarchy of safety, social and esteem needs to the need for self-fulfillment, the highest need of all. When a lower need is satisfied the next highest becomes dominant and the individual’s attention is turned to satisfying this higher need. The need for self-fulfillment, however, can never be satisfied. ‘Man is a wanting animal’; only an unsatisfied need can motivate behavior and the dominant need is the prime motivator of behavior. Psychological development takes place as people move up the hierarchy of needs, but this is not necessarily a straightforward progression. The lower needs still exist, even if temporarily dormant as motivators, and individuals constantly return to previously satisfied needs. (Armstrong, 2009)

Connections breaks Maslow’s theory

None of these needs starting with basic survival on up are possible without social connection and collaboration. Without collaboration, there is no survival. It was not possible, build a secure structure, or car for children while hunting without a team effort.  It’s more true now than then. Our reliance on each other grows as societies became more complex, interconnected, and specialized. Connection is a prerequisite for survival, physically and emotionally. What social media has done is make it infinitely easier for the social connection to take place.

“Needs are not hierarchical. Life is messier than that. Needs are, like most other things in nature, an interactive, dynamic system, but they are anchored in our ability to make social connections. Maslow's model needs rewiring so it matches our brains. The system of human needs from bottom to top, shelter, safety, sex, leadership, community, competence and trust, are dependent on our ability to connect with others.” (Denning, 2012)
Adopted by; www.forbs.com

Bibliography

1,Armstrong, M., (2009). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. 11th ed. London and Philadelphia: Kogan page.

2,Denning, S., (2012). What Maslow Missed. [Online]
Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2012/03/29/what-maslow-missed/#3217cef1661b
[Accessed: 06 Dec 2017 at 9.41pm].



Tuesday, November 21, 2017

Linea Clothing Internal Talent Pool

According to the organizational strategies and future plans there is a requirement of a talent pool which identify and develop needed leadership talent to execute business strategies. When the future of the organization becomes more predictable, internal development and a broader talent pool is to be essential to address future needs of the organization.

Key levels and positions of each critical areas of the Linea Clothing has to be considered to formulate and execute a backup with necessary talents in place.
Author drawn
Developing Internal Talent Pool

Talent pool required relevant competencies. Numbers of talents in this pool should align with department capability on business strategy and succession planning.  To achieve a match on talent and capability between existing and proposed leadership, talent development can be implemented in two different ways. (Deters, 2017)
·         “On demand” approach – identifying specific backup candidates for given key positions and every key position should have at least one backup candidate.
·         “In stock” approach – several internal candidates with potential to fill key positions will have been developed. Having talents “in stock” allows a quick and flexible response to the rapidly changing needs of the business.

Continuing an Internal Talent Pool

Talent management is essential to continue a talent pool. Management of talents enables business to meet business talent demands which are vital for the business strategies, talent management focuses on business prospects and aims to bring out the potentiality of each individual employee and recognizes the importance of maintaining individuals with requisite talents. (Kurgat, 2016). Below diagram shows that activities which has to be practiced to maintain an excellent talent pool. (Silzer & Dowell, 2009)
Author drawn


Bibliography

1.Deters, J., (2017). Global Leadership Talent Management: Successful Selection of Global Leadership Talents as an Integrated Process. s.l.:Emerald Group Publishing.

2.Silzer, R. & Dowell, B. E., (2009). Strategy-Driven Talent Management: A Leadership Imperative. s.l.:John Wiley & Sons.

3. Kurgat, A.C.,(2016). ‘Talent Management and its Importance for Today’s Organizations’, International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, Available at: www.managementjournal.info (Accessed: 22/11/2017 at 9.56pm).

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Amalgamation between Employer and Employee – Employee Relations

Employee relations has replaced industrial relations as the term for defining the relationship between employers and employees. Today, employee relations (ER) is seen as focusing on both individual and collective relationships in the workplace, with an increasing emphasis on helping line managers establish trust-based relationships with employees. A positive climate of employee relations - with high levels of employee involvement, commitment and engagement - can improve business outcomes as well as contribute to employees' well-being. (CIPD, 2017 Apr 24)

Both employer and employee have expectations. Employer expects that the all employees should work to achieve organizational goals with the organization policy and procedures. Also employees expects organization will treat them fairly, consistently and also will look after them in such conditions that includes their employment agreement. In MAS Holdings the company believe that all employees should have same facilities and they are working with the term which is “Facilities beyond expectations” to treat employees as stakeholders. The Trust between employer and employee is a significant fact in employee relations as level of trust within and between groups can change relationship in the work place and it is easy to violate, damage or lose the trust but it is difficult to build trust as trust can both evolve and dissolve as relationship change. (Skinner & Searle, 2011) The trust enrich the psychological contract which defined as the relationship between employer and employee where there are unwritten mutual expectations for each side. (Wikipedia, 2017) Further work engagement, job involvement and organization commitment has core relationship when building a strong ER.

 

A quality ER results in employees by mitigating employee’s dissatisfaction such as absenteeism, employee turnover, working to rule etc. improves employee loyalty within the organization. Also the organization getting benefits such as improving business outcome, cost effectiveness etc. (Leat, 2012)

Bibliography


1.CIPD, (2017). CIPD. [Online]
Available at: https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/employees/factsheet
[Accessed 14 November 2017].

2.Leat, M. (2012). Exploring Emlpoyee Relations. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

3.Skinner, D. & Searle, R. (2011). Trust and Human Resource Management. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

4.Wikipedia, (2017). Wikipedia. [Online]
Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_contract
[Accessed 14 Nov 2017].